Graded review
Fisetin as a Senolytic: What "Hit-and-Run" Dosing Shows
Fisetin was the standout senolytic flavonoid in mouse screens and extended lifespan ~10%. In humans, the longevity data are essentially zero. An honest review.
Evidence scorecard
- What a senolytic is, and why it's a serious ideaMixed / emerging
- The mouse evidence: fisetin was the standoutWell-supported
- The human evidence: the field's data isn't actually fisetin'sWell-supported
- The "hit-and-run" dosing pitch — promising, but unvalidated in peopleMixed / emerging
- Supplement, not approved drug — and what that meansWell-supported
- The gradeThin / contested
- The bottom lineMixed / emerging
Fisetin sits at an awkward intersection that makes it perfect for honest grading: it's a cheap, over-the-counter plant flavonoid, and it's also one of the most genuinely promising molecules in serious senolytic research. That combination breeds confusion — people see "published in real journals, screened by real aging labs" and assume the human longevity case is made. It isn't. This page walks through what fisetin actually showed in the mouse screens that made its name, why the "hit-and-run" intermittent dosing idea is appealing, and why the human longevity evidence is, bluntly, near-zero. For the wider map of what's earned its place versus what's hype, start with our pillar on longevity medicine: what's proven vs hyped.
What a senolytic is, and why it's a serious idea
As you age, some cells stop dividing but refuse to die — they become senescent. These "zombie cells" accumulate and secrete a soup of inflammatory signals (the senescence-associated secretory phenotype) that damages surrounding tissue. Cellular senescence is one of the formal hallmarks of aging8, and the leading review of the field lays out why clearing senescent cells is one of the most mechanistically compelling anti-aging strategies on the table3. A senolytic is a drug that selectively kills these senescent cells. The appeal of the approach — and the reason it's taken seriously by labs that are otherwise skeptical of supplements — is that, unlike a daily pill you take forever, senolytics could in principle work as "hit-and-run" therapy: a short, intermittent course that clears the zombie cells, which then take time to re-accumulate. That's the real, legitimate science behind fisetin. The question is whether fisetin specifically delivers it in humans.
The mouse evidence: fisetin was the standout
Fisetin earned its reputation honestly in the lab. When researchers screened a panel of flavonoids for senolytic activity, fisetin came out as one of the most potent at selectively clearing senescent cells2. The landmark follow-up went further: in aged mice, fisetin reduced senescent-cell burden across multiple tissues, lowered markers of age-related inflammation, restored tissue homeostasis, and — the headline result — extended both health and lifespan, even when treatment began late in life1. That last detail is what generated the excitement: a flavonoid you can buy in a capsule, given intermittently to already-old mice, extended their remaining lifespan on the order of ~10%.
That is a genuinely strong preclinical result, and it's why fisetin appears on the shortlist of credible senolytics rather than the junk pile. But it's mouse data — and this site's recurring caution applies with full force: rodent lifespan extensions translate to humans far less often than headlines imply, and a flavonoid that clears senescent cells in a mouse is a hypothesis about people, not a result in them.
Whose evidence is whose
| Fisetin | Dasatinib + Quercetin (different drug) | |
|---|---|---|
| Best evidence | Aged-mouse health & ~10% lifespan | First human senolytic trials |
| Human result | Longevity data essentially absent | ↓ senescent cells; some function gains |
| What it proves | Strong mechanism + mouse outcome | The senolytic concept works in people |
| Lifespan in humans? | No — not tested | No — short marker/function studies |
The human evidence: the field's data isn't actually fisetin's
Here's the honest pivot the marketing skips. There is a small but real body of human senolytic trial data — but most of it is for a different senolytic combination: dasatinib (a prescription chemotherapy drug) plus quercetin, not fisetin. In a first-in-human, open-label pilot in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, dasatinib plus quercetin improved some physical-function measures4. In a separate trial in people with diabetic kidney disease, the same combination measurably reduced senescent-cell burden in human fat and skin tissue — the first direct human evidence that senolytics do, in principle, clear zombie cells in people5. These are important proof-of-concept results for the senolytic concept. We grade that flagship combination in full — its mouse lifespan data, its small human trials, and the fact that it pairs a chemo drug with a flavonoid — in dasatinib + quercetin: how far along is the flagship senolytic?
But they are not fisetin, and they are not longevity trials — they're small, short studies of senescent-cell markers and function in sick patients. Fisetin's own human trials (run by serious groups, including large randomized studies in older adults and at-risk populations) are ongoing, and the published human longevity or healthspan results for fisetin specifically remain essentially absent. So the honest state of play is: the concept has early human support (via D+Q), the mouse data for fisetin are strong, and the human longevity data for fisetin itself are near-zero. Anyone selling fisetin as a proven human senolytic is borrowing credibility from a mouse study and a different drug's trials.
Fisetin by claim
- BSenolytic + lifespan effect in miceModerate evidence
Standout in flavonoid screens; ~10% lifespan in aged mice with intermittent dosing.
- DClearing senescent cells in humans (fisetin)Insufficient
Human proof-of-concept used dasatinib + quercetin, not fisetin.
- DExtending human lifespan / healthspanInsufficient
No fisetin human longevity results; poor oral bioavailability.
The "hit-and-run" dosing pitch — promising, but unvalidated in people
The intermittent-dosing idea (a few high-dose days every few weeks or months, rather than daily) is genuinely interesting and is how the mouse work and human pilots were structured. But it's important to be clear that the optimal human dose, schedule, and whether it produces any durable benefit are not established. Complicating matters, fisetin has poor oral bioavailability — it's rapidly metabolized and poorly absorbed, which is exactly why formulation researchers are working on enhanced-delivery versions6. The doses used in human trials (often ~20 mg/kg/day for two consecutive days) are far higher than what's in a typical supplement capsule, and whether a standard off-the-shelf fisetin product reaches senolytic concentrations in human tissue is unknown. Fisetin is also studied as a dietary flavonoid with broad, non-specific molecular activity7, which cuts both ways: lots of plausible mechanisms, but also less precision than a targeted drug.
Supplement, not approved drug — and what that means
Fisetin is sold as a dietary supplement, not an FDA-approved senolytic or anti-aging drug. It carries no approved indication, no required efficacy proof, and label content the manufacturer controls. On the reassuring side, it's a flavonoid found in foods (strawberries are a notable source) and the short, intermittent dosing used in trials has so far appeared tolerable in the studied groups15. But "appears tolerable in small short trials" is not the same as "proven safe for self-directed high-dose intermittent use over years," and high-dose flavonoid regimens taken without supervision aren't risk-free. The honest framing this site uses throughout: fisetin's mechanism and mouse data are strong, its human longevity efficacy is unproven, and its long-term safety at senolytic doses is not established — three separate claims the marketing collapses into one. We apply the same lens across the field in our best longevity supplements, rated by evidence roundup and in our review of peptides for longevity, where mechanism and marketing routinely outrun human outcomes — and the same borrowed-credibility problem hits the other senolytic flavonoid in quercetin for longevity: senolytic hype vs evidence, whose senolytic shine actually belongs to the dasatinib + quercetin combination. Fisetin also shows up bundled into multi-ingredient longevity formulas — most prominently NOVOS Core, where the same mouse-not-human gap applies inside a twelve-ingredient blend.
The grade
Longevity Graded verdict
Fisetin as a senolytic: Grade C − strong mouse data, near-zero human longevity data
- Mouse senolytic + lifespan data are genuinely strong — fisetin was a screen standout.
- The 'hit-and-run' intermittent-dosing concept is legitimate, serious science.
- But the human senolytic trials that worked used dasatinib + quercetin — NOT fisetin.
- Fisetin's own human longevity data are near-zero; oral bioavailability is poor.
- Sold as an unregulated supplement; high-dose intermittent self-use isn't proven safe long-term.
- Verdict: a C. Promising experimental senolytic, not a proven human anti-aging intervention.
The bottom line
Fisetin is the best of the senolytic flavonoids on paper: a standout in mouse screens, a strong preclinical package that extended health and lifespan in aged mice with intermittent "hit-and-run" dosing, and a place in the legitimate senolytic research program. But the human longevity evidence for fisetin specifically is near-zero — the encouraging human senolytic trials used a different drug combination (dasatinib plus quercetin), they measured senescent-cell markers and function rather than lifespan, and fisetin's own human trials haven't delivered longevity results yet. Add poor oral bioavailability and uncertainty about whether supplement doses even reach active levels, and the picture is clear: fisetin is a promising experimental senolytic, not a proven human anti-aging intervention. If you take it, take it knowing the mouse science is real and the human longevity payoff is unproven. For where senolytics fit alongside programs with real clinical oversight, see our graded best longevity clinics hub.
Frequently asked questions
Does fisetin actually work as a senolytic in humans?
Fisetin is a potent senolytic in mice — it cleared senescent cells and extended health and lifespan in aged animals. But there is essentially no published human longevity evidence for fisetin specifically. The encouraging human senolytic trials that reduced senescent cells used a different drug combination (dasatinib plus quercetin), not fisetin. So in humans, fisetin's senolytic benefit is unproven.
What is 'hit-and-run' senolytic dosing?
It's the idea that senolytics could be taken intermittently — short, high-dose courses every few weeks or months — rather than daily, because clearing senescent cells once buys time before they re-accumulate. This is how the mouse studies and human pilots were structured. The optimal human dose and schedule for fisetin, and whether it produces durable benefit, are not established.
How much fisetin extended mouse lifespan?
In the landmark aged-mouse study, intermittent fisetin reduced senescent-cell burden and inflammation and extended remaining health and lifespan on the order of about 10%, even when started late in life. That is a strong preclinical result, but it is mouse data — it has not been shown to translate to human lifespan.
Is fisetin safe to take?
Fisetin is a flavonoid found in foods like strawberries, and the short, intermittent doses used in trials have appeared tolerable in the studied groups. But its oral bioavailability is poor, the senolytic doses used in research are far higher than typical capsules, and long-term safety of self-directed high-dose intermittent use isn't established. This isn't medical advice — check with your clinician, especially if you take other medications.
References
- Yousefzadeh MJ, Zhu Y, McGowan SJ, et al. (2018). Fisetin is a senotherapeutic that extends health and lifespan.. EBioMedicine. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30279143/
- Zhu Y, Doornebal EJ, Pirtskhalava T, et al. (2017). New agents that target senescent cells: the flavone, fisetin, and the BCL-XL inhibitors, A1331852 and A1155463.. Aging (Albany NY). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28273655/
- Di Micco R, Krizhanovsky V, Baker D, d'Adda di Fagagna F (2021). Cellular senescence in ageing: from mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities.. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33328614/
- Justice JN, Nambiar AM, Tchkonia T, et al. (2019). Senolytics in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Results from a first-in-human, open-label, pilot study.. EBioMedicine. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30616998/
- Hickson LJ, Langhi Prata LGP, Bobart SA, et al. (2019). Senolytics decrease senescent cells in humans: Preliminary report from a clinical trial of Dasatinib plus Quercetin in individuals with diabetic kidney disease.. EBioMedicine. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31542391/
- Gunjal P, Vishwas S, Kumar R, et al. (2024). Enhancing the oral bioavailability of fisetin: polysaccharide-based self nano-emulsifying spheroids for colon-targeted delivery.. Drug Delivery and Translational Research. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38789909/
- Syed DN, Adhami VM, Khan N, Mukhtar H (2016). Exploring the molecular targets of dietary flavonoid fisetin in cancer.. Seminars in Cancer Biology. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27163728/
- López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G (2023). Hallmarks of aging: An expanding universe.. Cell. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36599349/
Medical disclaimer: This content is for general educational purposes only and is not medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a licensed healthcare professional before starting, stopping, or changing any treatment.
More graded reviews
Longevity Medicine: What's Proven vs Hyped
An honest, evidence-graded tour of the longevity toolkit — what has human outcome RCTs versus what is animal or mechanistic-only.
ReadDo NAD+ and Peptides Actually Extend Lifespan?
NAD+ precursors reliably raise NAD+ but show modest, mixed human outcomes. Peptides and growth hormone carry real cautions. An honest evidence review.
ReadRapamycin & Metformin for Longevity: The Evidence
Strong animal data, a glaring human RCT gap. What the PEARL pilot, the TAME rationale, and metformin's observational signal really show.
ReadAre Longevity Clinics Worth It?
DTC and IV longevity clinics sit on the weakest evidence in the field. What a critical review found, and how to vet a provider before paying.
ReadRapamycin for Longevity: Hype vs Evidence
Rapamycin is the most reproducible lifespan extender in mice — but there is no human longevity trial. An honest split of the hype from the evidence.
ReadWhat the PEARL Trial Actually Showed About Rapamycin
PEARL was the largest decentralized RCT of rapamycin in healthy aging — and it missed its primary endpoint. An honest readout of what it did and didn't prove.
ReadLongevity Clinics vs Lab Memberships vs Rx Telehealth: What Each Delivers
The longevity market splits into four bands: concierge clinics, membership programs, DTC labs, single-product Rx. What each delivers, and who it's for.
ReadBiological Age Tests: Do Epigenetic Clocks Actually Work?
Epigenetic clocks (Horvath, GrimAge, DunedinPACE) predict aging well in populations — but are noisy and unproven for individuals. An honest evidence review.
ReadNAD+ for Longevity: What the Trials Actually Show
NR and NMN reliably raise NAD+ in humans, but the trials mostly fail to show clinical or longevity outcomes. An honest review of the hype versus the data.
ReadWhat Do Longevity Biomarker Panels Actually Test?
Longevity panels mix genuinely useful, outcome-validated markers (ApoB, HbA1c, hs-CRP) with vanity numbers. An honest, evidence-graded breakdown.
ReadGLP-1s for Healthspan & Longevity: The Evidence
GLP-1 drugs have the strongest human outcome data in longevity — but it's cardiometabolic risk reduction, not proven lifespan extension. An honest review.
ReadPeptides for Longevity: What's Real and What's Marketing
Most longevity peptides are sold on mechanism and anecdote, not human outcomes. An honest, citation-backed review of what the evidence actually supports.
ReadMetformin for Longevity: The TAME Trial Evidence
Metformin's anti-aging case is mechanistic and observational — no completed RCT proves it. Why the TAME trial exists, and the exercise caveat.
ReadConcierge vs Membership Longevity: What You Actually Get
Concierge clinics ($8k–$25k/yr) sell diagnostics; membership programs ($99–$300/mo) sell ongoing treatment. What each delivers, and where the money goes.
ReadHow We Grade Longevity Providers: Our Methodology
The five-axis rubric behind our longevity provider rankings: oversight, evidence honesty, transparency, price, and conflicts of interest.
ReadBest Longevity Supplements, Rated by Evidence (2026)
We grade the popular longevity supplements — NMN, NR, spermidine, resveratrol, CoQ10, omega-3, vitamin D, fisetin, GlyNAC — on human evidence, not hype.
ReadWhat Is a Longevity Doctor (and Do You Need One)?
A longevity doctor blends preventive medicine, biomarker testing, and lifestyle coaching. What they really do, credentials to check, and who needs one.
ReadSpermidine for Longevity: What the Evidence Shows
Spermidine induces autophagy and dietary intake tracks with lower mortality — but the best human trial was negative. An honest, evidence-graded review.
ReadThe Sitting-Rising Test & Longevity: What the Evidence Actually Shows
The sitting-rising and sit-to-stand tests predict mortality in research — but they're markers of strength, balance, and flexibility, not a verdict.
ReadHow Much Does a Longevity Clinic Cost?
Longevity care runs from ~$200/yr lab memberships to $20k+ concierge programs. A 2026 price-band guide to what each tier buys — and what's worth paying for.
ReadFree Biological-Age Tests & Calculators: Do They Actually Work?
Free biological-age calculators range from validated (PhenoAge from a basic blood panel) to entertainment. An honest guide to what's worth your time.
ReadTaurine for Longevity: Does the 2023 Science Study Hold Up?
A 2023 Science paper called taurine deficiency a driver of aging. A 2025 Science follow-up questioned its core premise. An honest, evidence-graded review.
ReadUrolithin A (Mitopure): Mitochondrial Hype or Real?
Urolithin A (Mitopure) has the cleanest human-trial record of any mitochondrial supplement — modest muscle gains in RCTs. But healthspan isn't lifespan.
ReadGlyNAC (Glycine + NAC) for Aging: What the Baylor Trials Actually Show
Baylor RCTs report GlyNAC corrects glutathione deficiency and several aging hallmarks in older adults. But the trials are small and the headlines overstate it.
ReadAlpha-Ketoglutarate (Rejuvant/AKG): Does the "8 Years Younger" Claim Hold Up?
The viral "8 years younger" AKG result came from a 42-person study with no placebo group and an unvalidated aging clock. An honest evidence review.
ReadDasatinib + Quercetin: How Far Along Is the Flagship Senolytic?
Dasatinib + quercetin is the first-in-human senolytic — with small IPF and kidney signals. But it's a chemo drug plus a flavonoid, with no longevity RCT yet.
ReadTruDiagnostic TruAge Review: Is the $229 Epigenetic Clock Worth It?
TruDiagnostic's TruAge uses the well-validated DunedinPACE clock — but no test proves the score predicts YOUR outcomes. An honest, evidence-graded review.
ReadFunction Health Review: Are 100+ Biomarkers Worth $499/yr?
Function Health's 100+ lab membership surfaces real outcome-validated markers — but roughly half are basic labs, and it tests without treating. Honest review.
ReadBryan Johnson's Blueprint Review: Evidence vs N-of-1 Hype
Bryan Johnson's Blueprint is a single-subject experiment with no control group — and roughly 90% of its likely benefit is replicable diet, sleep, and exercise.
ReadVO2 Max and Longevity: The Strongest Fitness Predictor of Lifespan
Cardiorespiratory fitness is one of the best-validated predictors of mortality — low fitness carries risk on par with smoking, and it's trainable.
ReadGrip Strength as a Longevity Biomarker: What the Evidence Shows
In the 140,000-person PURE study, grip strength outpredicted systolic blood pressure for mortality. A genuinely strong, free, at-home biomarker.
ReadFasting-Mimicking Diet (ProLon) Review: Does the Evidence Hold Up?
ProLon's 5-day fasting-mimicking diet has real human trials behind it — but most are tied to its inventor's company. An honest, graded look.
ReadHyperbaric Oxygen for Aging: Does the Telomere Claim Hold Up?
One small Israeli trial reported HBOT lengthened telomeres 38% and cut senescent cells. It's striking, unreplicated, and expensive. An honest, graded review.
ReadCreatine for Aging: The Cheapest Evidence-Backed Supplement?
Creatine has the strongest human evidence of any longevity supplement — for healthspan, not lifespan. With resistance training it adds muscle and strength.
ReadThe Hallmarks of Aging, Explained (and Why They Matter)
The hallmarks of aging are the cellular processes that drive getting old. A plain-English guide to the 2013 and 2023 framework — and why each one gets targeted.
ReadSulforaphane for Longevity: Promising Biology, Preclinical Proof
Sulforaphane from broccoli extends lifespan in worms and activates Nrf2 — but the human longevity evidence is preclinical. An honest, evidence-graded review.
ReadGlycine for Longevity: The Other Half of GlyNAC
Glycine alone extended mouse lifespan ~6% in the ITP. But the dramatic 'reverses aging' results belong to the GlyNAC combo, not solo glycine. An honest review.
ReadMicrodose Lithium for Longevity & Brain Aging: The Evidence
A 2025 Nature study tied lithium deficiency to Alzheimer's in mice. But that's mouse healthspan, not human lifespan — and lithium has a narrow safety window.
ReadErgothioneine: The "Longevity Vitamin"? An Evidence-Graded Review
Ergothioneine has a strong observational link to lower mortality — but no human trial, and the signal may just track a healthy diet. An honest grade.
ReadOmega-3 for Longevity: What the DO-HEALTH Trial Actually Shows
DO-HEALTH found 1 g/day omega-3 slowed epigenetic clocks by ~3–4 months. Real, randomized — but a small, surrogate effect. An honest evidence grade.
ReadCoQ10 & Ubiquinol for Aging: What the Evidence Actually Shows
KiSel-10 showed CoQ10 plus selenium cut cardiovascular mortality in elderly Swedes — but the benefit is CV-specific, not lifespan. An honest grade.
ReadBest Epigenetic Clock: GrimAge vs PhenoAge vs DunedinPACE
GrimAge predicts mortality, PhenoAge predicts disease, DunedinPACE measures pace of aging. No clock is validated to guide your treatment. An honest comparison.
ReadGlycanAge Review: Is the Glycan Aging Test Worth It?
GlycanAge measures IgG glycans tied to inflammation, and they move with lifestyle — but independent validation is thin and it can't localize a problem. Graded.
ReadGalleri Multi-Cancer Test Review: Is It Worth It?
Galleri's blood test can flag a cancer signal across many types — but no trial shows it saves lives, and false positives trigger costly cascades. Graded.
ReadFountain Life vs Human Longevity Inc: MRI Clinics Compared
Two whole-body-MRI longevity clinics compared. The headline isn't the price — it's the incidentaloma problem: most scary scan findings turn out to be nothing.
ReadSauna & Longevity: What the Finnish Studies Actually Show
Frequent sauna use is tied to ~40% lower all-cause mortality in Finnish men — but it's one observational cohort, not a randomized trial. An honest grade-B read.
ReadCold Plunge for Longevity: Hype vs Evidence
Cold exposure extends lifespan in worms and flies — but there's zero human lifespan data, and the human evidence is about recovery and mood, not living longer.
ReadZone 2 Training for Longevity: The Evidence, Graded Honestly
Zone 2 has a strong mitochondrial mechanism and builds the fitness that predicts lifespan — but no trial proves Zone 2 itself extends life. Graded honestly.
ReadOutlive by Peter Attia: An Evidence-Based Review
Attia's Outlive popularized Medicine 3.0 and the Four Horsemen. We grade the framework honestly: where the evidence is strong, and where it's reasoned opinion.
ReadBest Longevity Blood Test Services, Compared (2026)
Function, InsideTracker, Lifeforce, Superpower — graded honestly. The four cheap outcome-validated markers matter; the '100+ biomarker' count mostly doesn't.
ReadBest At-Home Biological Age Test (2026): Honestly Graded
Blood-methylation clocks are the only defensible at-home bio-age tier; saliva and telomere kits are noisier. None proves you're aging slower. Honestly graded.
ReadInsideTracker Review: Worth It in 2026?
InsideTracker adds DNA and an 'InnerAge' score to blood panels. The core markers are real, but it's pricier per marker and recommendations skew to upsells.
ReadLifeforce Review: Is the Membership Worth It?
Lifeforce bundles a clinician and Rx onto a ~50-marker quarterly panel for ~$129/mo. That crosses test-into-treat — but the panel is narrow and the upsell real.
ReadDoes Resveratrol Actually Work for Longevity?
A skeptical, evidence-graded review: the SIRT1 story was an artifact, a 2025 primate trial found no lifespan benefit, and oral resveratrol barely reaches cells.
ReadCollagen for Aging: What the Evidence Says
Industry-funded trials show skin and joint benefits; independent reviews are cautious. Collagen digests to amino acids, and the longevity claim is unproven.
ReadQuercetin for Longevity: Senolytic Hype vs Evidence
Quercetin's senolytic effect needs the dasatinib combination. Standalone quercetin has no human senolytic evidence — just modest anti-inflammatory effects.
ReadSuperpower Health Review: Is the $499 100-Lab Membership Worth It?
Superpower's $499/yr 100+ lab membership is slick and cheap-per-marker — but it tests without treating, and the panel leans on padding. Honest, graded review.
ReadFunction Health vs Superpower: Which Lab Membership Wins?
Function Health vs Superpower, graded honestly: nearly identical 100+ lab memberships that both test without treating. The tiebreaker isn't the marker count.
ReadNOVOS Core Review: Does the 12-Ingredient Longevity Drink Work?
NOVOS Core bundles 12 longevity ingredients into one daily drink. The formulation logic is real; the human lifespan proof isn't. An honest, graded review.
ReadTally Health Review: Is the TruAge Epigenetic Membership Worth It?
Tally Health pairs a TruAge epigenetic-age test with coaching and a supplement. The clock is real science; tracking your own aging with it isn't proven.
ReadNOVOS vs Tally Health: Which Longevity Brand Is Worth It?
NOVOS sells a multi-pathway longevity supplement; Tally Health sells an epigenetic-age test plus its own pill. A graded, honest head-to-head on what's proven.
ReadSpermidine vs Fisetin: Two Longevity Supplements, Honestly Compared
Spermidine targets autophagy; fisetin clears senescent cells. Different mechanisms, different evidence grades — an honest, head-to-head longevity comparison.
ReadFunction Health vs InsideTracker: Which Lab-Test Membership Wins?
Function casts a wide 100+ marker net; InsideTracker pairs fewer markers with an algorithm. We grade breadth, actionability, price — and who each fits.
ReadGlycine vs GlyNAC: Is Adding NAC Worth It for Longevity?
GlyNAC adds N-acetylcysteine to glycine for glutathione restoration. Is the extra ingredient worth it for longevity? An honest, graded comparison.
ReadAcarbose for Longevity: The Strongest Mouse Drug You've Never Heard Of
Acarbose robustly extended mouse lifespan in the NIA's rigorous ITP — better replicated than most longevity drugs. But there are zero human longevity trials.
ReadIntermittent Fasting for Longevity: What the Human Trials Actually Show
Time-restricted eating and 5:2 have strong animal data — but human trials show the benefit is mostly about eating less, not the clock. No lifespan proof.
ReadBerberine for Longevity: Nature's Metformin, or Marketing?
Berberine activates AMPK like metformin and lowers glucose and lipids in humans — but its longevity evidence is animal-only. An honest look at the hype.
Read